109(g)(1) -- Willful Failure to Obey Court Orders

If the court dismissed your case for willful failure to appear or comply with court orders, you cannot file again for 180 days.

What the Statute Says

11 U.S.C. Section 109(g)(1): No individual may be a debtor under this title who has been a debtor in a case pending under this title at any time in the preceding 180 days if "the case was dismissed by the court for willful failure of the debtor to abide by orders of the court, or to appear before the court in proper prosecution of the case."

The critical word is "willful." Not every dismissal for noncompliance triggers the 180-day bar. The debtor's failure must reflect a deliberate choice to ignore the court's authority -- not merely a mistake, a misunderstanding, or circumstances beyond the debtor's control.

What "Willful" Means

Courts have interpreted "willful" to mean intentional or reflecting a conscious disregard for the court's authority. The analysis typically turns on these factors:

Scenarios That Trigger 109(g)(1)

Scenarios That Do NOT Trigger 109(g)(1)

These common dismissal reasons do not constitute "willful failure to abide by orders of the court" and therefore do not trigger the 180-day filing bar:

When Your Attorney's Mistake Is Not Your Fault

In high-volume bankruptcy practices, it is not uncommon for an attorney to fail to communicate a court order or deadline to a client. If you did not comply because your attorney never told you about the order, your failure may not be "willful." The case may still be dismissed, but the 109(g)(1) filing bar should not apply if you were never aware of the requirement.

This matters in two ways:

  1. For the 180-day bar: If you can show you did not know about the order because your attorney failed to communicate it, you may argue that the failure was not willful and 109(g)(1) does not apply.
  2. For malpractice: If your attorney's negligence caused the dismissal and triggered a 180-day bar that harmed you (for example, your house was foreclosed during the bar period), you may have a malpractice claim against the attorney. That claim is separate from the bankruptcy proceedings.

If your case was dismissed and you believe your attorney's negligence was the cause, check the dismissal order carefully. If it says "willful failure" but you were never told about the order, the characterization may be wrong -- and it may be worth challenging if you need to refile within 180 days.

What If the Dismissal Order Does Not Say "Willful"?

The statute requires that the case was "dismissed by the court for willful failure." If the dismissal order simply says "dismissed for failure to file schedules" or "dismissed for failure to appear" without using the word "willful" or equivalent language, there is an argument that 109(g)(1) does not apply.

Some courts will look beyond the order's specific language to the underlying facts: did the debtor act willfully, regardless of what the order says? Other courts take a stricter approach and require the dismissal order itself to reflect a willfulness determination. Check how courts in your district handle this question before relying on the absence of "willful" language.

Calculate Your Earliest Refiling Date

If 109(g)(1) applies, the 180-day clock starts from the date of the dismissal order.

Legal References

PACER cases made free through RECAP: 0 of 37.9 million

Every document we access becomes permanently free for the next researcher, attorney, or debtor.

$0 of $5,000 Q1 PACER research goal

1,500+ hours. No grants, no institutional backing. 0 supporters so far.

Fund this research

Federal Rules Committee

This research supports Suggestion 26-BK-3 to the Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules

Proposing automated Section 1328(f) discharge bar screening in federal bankruptcy courts